The Cleveland blogosphere is full of egomaniacal poseurs who only promote Cleveland as a front for personalized, self-contained, circle-jerking whuffie inflation. Far too many Cleveland bloggers are interested in increasing their apparent social capital (and lining their pockets while doing so) than actually improving the city. Norm Roulet at RealNEO, George Nemeth, “Tech Czar” Michael DeAloia, Meet the Bloggers, and the Cleveland Social Media Club, I’m looking at you.
shaking out the good, bad and the ugly PESONALITIES may not be the most productive way to advance NEO. Shaking out the ideas is another thing.
Well Jeff, you’re wrong. The personalities are the problem. In the time that Cleveland bloggers have spent chasing grant money or scrambling for access and influence with the people in power, they could have actually accomplished some game-changing benefit for the city. Yet whenever two or more gather in the name of Blogging for Change™, agendas and personalities clash and the conversations inevitably turn toward monetizing the activity. “Hey this sounds great! Let’s get someone to pay us to do it!” And then, when the smell of money starts to smell like work, the new hotness becomes the new hot potato.
You don’t think the Cleveland blogosphere luminaries are out to make a buck and make a name for themselves? Wake up! Grab a cup of coffee and read on.
Data Point One - Norm Roulet & RealNEO
Here’s a pretty egregious example of money chasing:
Trust-fund baby Norm Roulet keeps trying to squeeze $10 (or 20 or 30) million out of the County to (initially):
establish 1) Real Co-Op Food: a $10 million economic development co-op fund for local foods sector development in 2009, and 2) Real Co-op Info: a $10 million economic development co-op fund for open source information technology and social computing development in 2009.
which then morphed into the RealNEO messiah-of-the-month Marc Canter’s idea:
I have proposed a $10 million open source social computing community development initiative to Commissioner Jones and many of the directors at the County and have every reason to believe that will proceed, which will shift all our focus to developing “Citizen Dashboard”
and we get back to the food thing which claims that RealNEO was
recently recognized as one of the top networks of our type in the country, by the Knight Foundation
but the truth comes out in a comment:
The Knight Foundation did not recognize Realneo.us directly, but rather The Knight Foundation funded a study at, as I remember, the University of Missouri school of Journalism.
What this really means is that the Knight Foundation hasn’t even heard of RealNEO; just some journalism researchers in Missouri. What is troubling though, is that Norm Roulet is essentially lying on his resume about the Knight Foundation recognition in order to improve his chances at getting some cash.
Remember, this is a guy who, when asked for details on how to draft a proposal for grant funding for RealNEO said:
Not only is it stupid to assume that someone is going to give you money when you don’t even have a plan, it definitely shows a lack of integrity on the part of RealNEO as a whole to make up something to put into a grant proposal in order to get money, instead of having a legitimate idea and then seeking grant money for it. Including grant money to go to Paris:
I like your thinking - REAL COOP/REALNEO needs to be at Drupalcon09 in Paris, and push for Drupalcon10 in NEO.
It’s going in the budget for Cuyahoga County, I can tell you that right now.
Hm. Sure sounds legit to me!
Data Point 2 - Meet the Bloggers
Meet the Bloggers was a fantastic opportunity to legitimize the “local bloggers as citizen journalists” paradigm. It ended as a bloody gutter abortion due to personality conflicts and greed. Meet the Bloggers started as a way to get more in-depth coverage of candidates in the 2005 Cleveland mayoral race. There were some costs associated with the project, a variety of fundraisers were held, and funding was sought to help sustain the quality of the content.
Funding ended up being sought a little more zealously than quality content, and when Tim Russo, one of the founders and the main driving force for scheduling top quality interviews, was kicked out because of his past, no one else had the gumption to keep things kicking. The last interview was two years ago, and toward the end, Meet the Bloggers scraped the barrel-bottom by interviewing their friends (perfectly great people in their own right, but not up to snuff in terms of MTB’s initial ambitious goals).
There have been indications lately that Meet The Bloggers is going to be resurrected (or, more likely, turned into Zombie Meet The Bloggers).
Where the plot really thickens however, is that just about every piece of information about the reasons the original Meet the Bloggers aborted has mysteriously disappeared from the internet. Just about the only thing you can find about those fateful weeks in 2006 is in this post by Bridget Ginley. Incidentally, she’s said that:
my post about the whole meet the bloggerbooger screw over has had more hits in the last few weeks than ever before.
What is clear is that someone committed a felony by hacking into Blogger Interrupted and deleting three posts. Only three posts are missing, and it just so happens that all three posts have to do with Meet the Bloggers. Tim Russo has his suspicions that George Nemeth is involved in this fiasco. In response, George posted this smug non-denial:
Here’s a note I sent my MTB friend Tim regarding his recent technical glitches:
Hey Tim. How are you doing? It’s been a long time. Sorry to hear that you’re missing content on your blog. I can imagine how you feel. Last time BFD crashed, I lost about 5 months of posts that I’ll never get back. While jumping to the conclusion that I “hacked your blog” seems reasonable based on our past history, hacking would be unprofessional and frankly unethical. I think my standards are much higher then that.
which stinks to holy hell. Another commenter says:
what you have quoted here is something i would write if i were guilty as a former buffalo bills running back.
To summarize: Two posts about George Nemeth and one post about Scott Piepho and their involvement with Meet the Bloggers were deleted by someone who hacked into Tim Russo’s weblog. The bad blood between George and Tim results in accusations from Tim and a snarky non-denial from George.
As of now it appears that Tim is letting the issue go, but if there is one conclusion that can be reached from this little story, it is that the parties involved in Meet the Bloggers have made it a morass of self-interest. What could have been an amazing 4 years of innovative citizen journalism was ruined by avarice. That makes any attempt to resurrect Meet the Bloggers automatically up for suspicion of ulterior motives. Where’s the money this time?
Data Point 3 - Cleveland Social Media Club
I’m sure there are plenty of members of the Cleveland Social Media Club who just think it’s a fun excuse to get some drinks and pass around some egoboo, but the main movers and shakers are after money, again. The newer, innocent members of the Clevosphere are in danger of being sucked into the “how can i monetize my opinions” paradigm by the same old crew that has spent the last 5 years trying to get money for their own opinions. The newbies have no idea what they are walking into. The names are familiar:
For example, the Cleveland Social Media Ventures Workgroup, headed by former Cleveland Tech Czar Michael DeAloia:
The SMVF was originally conceived as an “ever-green” fund that would raise between $3.0 million and $5.0 million in Cleveland and Northeast Ohio to invest in the fledgling social media industry. The SMCC took it upon itself to apply for Third Frontier Funds from the State of Ohio. Every economic development group that the SMCC took this concept too offered key advice but little in the way of overt support. Based upon the complexity and the very short duration of time that the SMCC had to register with the State of Ohio it was decided to shelve the concept until the fall of 2009. That was until the SMCC, after during significant research, discovered an opportunity to request $30,000 in a grant from the Civic Innovation Lab (www.civicinnovationlab.org). These grant dollars would help support the legal fees and consulting fees necessary to successfully launch the SMVF.
Sound familiar? From the same post:
All expectations out of the event were that other start-ups were going to begin percolating in Cleveland. I am part of two start-ups (and a third being discussed) that will begin development and beta testing very soon.
That should definitely sound familiar. In fact, it sounds like Michael DeAloia is trying to use the Cleveland Social Media Venture Fund as a way to funnel money into his own start-ups. He should get together with Norm Roulet!
George Nemeth is in the mix again, looking for money, any money at all (comments can be found digging through here):
who else should we be talking about this to? Is there federal money (Congressman Ryan’s Tech Belt Initiative)? Venture Capital? Angel investors?
and can’t understand why TechLift might dismiss their request:
Why would they torpedo our request? It’s probably the most viable proposal they’ll receive…
I’m guessing the reason is because grant-making committees are bloodhounds after bullshit proposals. They can sense insincerity and greed just by smelling the paper such proposals are printed on.
The Cleveland Social Media Club sounds more like a non-profit than a club. They have a Steering Committee, a Social Media Center Workgroup and the aforementioned Social Media Venture Fund. And the membership is crowd-sourcing Michael DeAloia’s and George Nemeth’s work for them. One way these guys have improved over the years is that they’ve figured out a way to get other people to do the work for them. Join a group to help the Tech Czar fund his own start-ups!
Addendum
Tom Guard at The Daily Bragger got his feelings hurt a couple of weeks ago when we commented about his post about the CSMC and sent BHC an email:
I really thought you had a great concept with your blog. I enjoyed reading it. I even considered linking to it. That is until I got a pretty vile backlink. Why would it be such a bad thing for members of Cleveland’s Social Media Club to get together and write an ebook on social networking? There is no marketing ploy. As a blogger, local business owner and resident inside the city of Cleveland, I’m really dissapointed with your latest post. Good luck with your blog,
First off, this email is a joke. It is written by a guy whose LinkedIn profile claims his primary job is Author/Blogger and whose job description consists of: “Write and demonstrate blogging tips, social media tips and opinionated news.” His business is telling other people how to make money by blogging. No wonder he had his feelings hurt, his whole shtick is self-marketing.
Also, George Nemeth, CSMC founding member, does SEO marketing for Adcom/Optiem, a marketing agency; Dominic Litten (founder of CSMC), Senior Account Executive for Fathom SEO, a marketing agency; Michael DeAloia does little else but talk about social media marketing on his blog and his best friend, John Heaney is a social media marketer. And that vapid Cleveland Social Media video? - It was made by thunder::tech, a local marketing agency who’s founder, Jason Therrien, is also a member of the Cleveland Social Media Club.
So, Tom Guard of The Daily Bragger, when you tell me that anything the CSMC does isn’t a marketing ploy, I call bullshit. Try harder.
Wrap-up
It’s just… tiring; the same people year after year, trying gimmick after gimmick to get someone to hand them money. That’s the way people seem to operate in Cleveland. How can I trick people into funding my pet project? How can I scam some cash for my business associate? Screw whether the project is viable, or whether it even needs money to be a success in the first place. What’s in it for me?
You know what… trying to bootstrap your ideas in order to make a buck is the American way. There’s nothing wrong with that. But pretending that your motives are altruistic while doing so is scummy shyster behavior. Be honest, motherfuckers. Admit that you’re out for yourselves, to feed your egos, to make an easy buck. You’ll feel a lot better about yourselves - it will be freeing. Come out of the closet. And, in case you didn’t know this, your efforts at marketing improve nothing. Try harder.
8 Comments
1 Tim Russo wrote:
it’s on. good luck with the Civic Innovation Lab! if you guys want me to consult as a former applicant, pay me!
2 rlmthree wrote:
I promise you I have no ties to any projects or persons involved in this post, but I couldn’t let it go by without comment.
First, this is the first anonymous post I’ve seen on Blackheart, which I think is a tad weak.
That aside, I think there would be a lot more value to calling out issues with these projects, rather than some odd smear attempt on the people involved.
At the end of the article there is the admission that it’s simply the “pretending that your motives are altruistic” that is the issue. Trust me when I say motives are in the eye of the beholder, and I follow a few of these folks’ blogs and tweets and never for a second did I feel they pretended to be anything other than businessmen. Their self-aggrandizement is self-evident.
I think the heart of the problem is that this article is trying to get us to not trust these people. It strikes me as a time-honored “alternative reporter” (read: Roldo) technique that is most often used on politicians. Well, politicians are people who are in the public trust and need this type of watchdog. These people are businessmen seemingly trying to skate the line between helping the city and helping themselves.
Perhaps you’re right that these are hucksters trying to exploit people’s interest in helping the city, but I think you’d get farther (and sound less… ahem… extreme) by simply pointing out the problems with projects.
Frankly, this kind of article, written the way it is, makes me think this new website about our fair city is just another spiteful person with axes to grind. If that’s what Blackheart is… that saddens me.
3 Tim Russo wrote:
be saddened, then. this shit ain’t beanbag.
4 Adam Harvey wrote:
Now Tim, I don’t think that’s completely fair.
rlmthree - The mission of BHC is to bring the best and worst of Cleveland to light. There have been plenty of posts about the best of Cleveland. This one is about the worst. If one post (filled with evidence) that isn’t all lovey-dovey colors your opinion of the entire site, you might be a little extreme yourself.
In regard to the anonymity, BLACKHEART is the editorial voice of the site. Do you have a similar problem with unsigned editorials in newspapers? If so, that’s fine. Just want to make sure you’re consistent.
5 rlmthree wrote:
First, Tim, I would note that this _is_ beanbag. This post does far more damage to your reputation as a blogger than to the intended targets (for a neutral observer). The problem is tone and pettiness. Adam, I think you’re right on about my one-sided perception. I had to sit back and remember all the neighborhood business interviews and positive items this site has already presented. Certainly I value a site that can illuminate the good and bad, but there is something very off here. Citing blog commenters with similar suspicions to yours is anything but evidence. Intimating guilt on hacking a website, beefing up the accusation with federal crime, and having not an ounce of proof, an IP address, a login record — this is internet loon territory.Finally, regarding anonymity. I do recognize editorial bylines. And like I said, this is the first item I’ve seen the ENTIRE SITE endorse — seems like as a policy the three authors I see listed can’t get behind A Cookie and a Cupcake, but it can get behind calling out these personalities. I can tell you that any and all positive stories you have are easily forgotten when your central tenet seems to be tilting at windmills. Honestly, these people aren’t going away. You might get a rise out of them, but neutral observers who think it’s more likely than not that you accidentally deleted a couple posts are going to peg you as a loon and move on. They’ll be sad, and they’ll drop you from the RSS feed. Sounds like Tim’s happy to throw beanbags and act loony. But there s another way. Just pull back the curtain, show where people are money-grubbing, illuminate bad plans, and drop the paranoia.Or not.
6 bridgetDginley wrote:
Perhaps your right ? PERHAPS it’s time to call the spade a spade, whether how jaded that may seem to your sunshine day here in happy cleveland ohio. as someone who longs for do-gooders ,wrong righters and anti heros to use their power for good - this is not how these people should be miss~behaven. Kudos to Black<3 for your balls & chains treatment of these SHYstirrers - dJbg
7 Tim Russo wrote:
this post is the opinion of the site as a whole, not one writer or another. as such, it carries the weight of the site with it. so eat it.
8 Adam Harvey wrote:
If I’m understanding you correctly, rlmthree, you’re saying that it isn’t the majority of the content of the post (apart from the “loon territory” stuff you mention) that saddens you, but the framing of it. That it is framed in terms of personalities, not the actual proposals.
I understand where you’re coming from. After awhile though, when the same people keep popping up with crummy ideas, perhaps it is the personalities that need to be addressed.
The editorial byline is meant to be used, on occasion, when the writers here need to speak ex cathedra. Assuming that we don’t all think A Cookie & A Cupcake is great because it wasn’t posted under the byline is a bit weird to me. Everything would have to be posted under the anonymous byline in that case.
I’m glad that you’re commenting on this post, and interested in how BHC evolves, but at the same time, I’d like to ask you: Why did you wait so long? Why did you wait to comment until you saw something you disagreed with? Why haven’t you commented on the positive things we’ve posted and contributed to the good karma?
Your points are worth listening to, and I appreciate your tone, but your argument is undermined just a little when your first comment is a critical one about how we’re being critical. I’m not pissed at you or trying to piss you off. I hope you’ll comment more often. It’s nice to have a conversation around here.
4 Trackbacks